Air Jordan Spizike Stealth Review

jordan spizike stealth

I originally purchased the Air Jordan Spizike Stealth thinking it would be an on-court shoe. That was completely off the mark. I’ve played in these things a dozen or so times. The aches I got from those experiences has left me convinced that the Air Jordan Spizike Stealth are nothing more than fashion accessories–and great ones, too.

Comfort – 1/5

As a basketball shoe, the comfort of the Air Jordan Spizike Stealth are horrible. Their tightness is vice-like, not allowing for much movement, which is a problem for me since I have very high arches which makes for an extremely inverted landing. My instep sometimes never hits the floor, and so proper landing requires a fair amount of give so that my foot can find some balance. these shoes do not provide that at all, and I always feel at risk of rolling my ankle.

Even after playing with them enough it seemed as though I was still trying to wear them in. My only conclusion is that they simply were not made for the type of quick movements required on the court; I was attempting to turn a casual shoe into a basketball shoe.

If I had to say one good thing about their comfort it is that the ankle support is nice and high, but you’ll see below how even that wasn’t necessarily constructed for on-the-court ankle support.

Performance – 1/5

Structural Tests

Lateral stability test: Average

Rigidity test: Very rigid

Typically, I appreciate a nice, rigid shoe that feels relatively tight around my foot, and the lateral stability of the Stealths are nothing to complain about (until you wrap the shoe around your foot, see my issue with the difficulty in landing in these shoes). The problem with the Stealth is that not only are they too tight (see Comfort), but also that their tightness is focused around areas of the foot that make wearing the shoe slightly debilitating.

There are two points on the foot where the shoe hugs really tight: the front end of the metatarsus bones extending out to the toes and the talus bone just below the lower ankle.The first tight spot simply doesn’t make sense; I would much rather the middle part of my foot feel the support instead of my toes. The second tight spot has me thinking that the high ankle support is simply for show since the actual support is found a bit below the ankle. It’s worth mentioning again that this support is much more of an uncomfortable squeeze than a typical support.

Design – 5/5

Although the Spizike Stealth have a definite retro look to them, they are actually a new shoe–just a mashup of retro Jordans. From wikipedia,

Michael Jordan and Spike Lee released the Jordan Spiz’ike shoes on October 21, 2006, as a tribute to their historic relationship. The relationship began when Mars Blackmon (a character from Spike Lee’s film, She’s Gotta Have It) became the primary pitchman in Nike commercials for Air Jordans. The Spiz’ike is a mash-up of the Jordan III, IV, V, VI, Air Jordan IX and XX shoes.

As the final member of the Spizike series, the Stealths are a combination of the best aesthetic aspects of the Jordan III, IV, V and VI. They have that elephant print heel and toe cup which were championed beautifully by the Jordan IIIs. Although when you compare the two, the etching resembles the Jordan XXs much more than the IIIs, as the newer versions were laser etched. Apart from Spike Lee’s hideous face on the back of the left sneaker, the Jordan Spizike Stealth really are a beautiful shoe.

jordan spizike stealth a mashup of jordan III, IV, V, VI
From top left, clockwise: Jordan IIIs, Jordan IVs, the insanely ugly Jordan VIs, and the Jordan Vs

Value – 1/5

I’ve seen the Air Jordan Spizike Stealth retail anywhere from $175 to $90.

I rated these as a poor value for a basketball shoe simply because they should not be considered a basketball shoe. That said, they are  a nice pair of kicks to own.

As a casual, stylish shoe they are well made and have now lasted my (casual) wear and tear for a few years. In some circumstances they can also pass as a more formal–albeit hip–shoe if you’re only exposing the black, shiny leather and the elephant heel trim.

 

Comments

  1. pippen says

    The final photo of course being the most controversial. It’s been rumored that on the day of this photo shoot, you’d gone and suffered a home loss to these very Stealths in FIFA 2006 ? Thats sad, mate. A real dagga’. Didn’t think it possible, really. Supposedly a brief but brilliant 0-1 result at Stamford Bridge in which your obviously distracted blogger here, mr. hoopla, passed a lit dutchie to the inanimate J’s, burning and scarring the pair’s left tongue (not to mention a small portion of superior laces). Upon recognizing his mistake and intervening, said blogger knocked the opponents’ FIFA controller off the pair’s soles and onto its buttons. The left joystick and unnamed colored buttons ( probably A ; always known to be an instigator) torqued and thumped in what seemed at first a meaningless assault. However, the impact and subsequent final resting position of the controller, in a moment purely ironic, sparked both kick-off whistle and an ever-accelerating 80 yard due-West firestorm dash slash gol from Leo Messi, the Barcelona man essentially sprinting the ball unmanned into the back of Cech’s virtual net. No qualms about it, the finest solo goal in the EA simulation’s history, I hear, gone ignored and unseen. Sadly after a legendary 9 second opening , the match’s remains were to be neglected, never to be continued and ultimately unplugged during the creation of the above blog. The three points legally of course go to the shoes, literally sacrificing one their shiny tongues for the win, Airness style. And for hoopla, the most random of innocent gafs causes his first FIFA loss in 18 tries against articles of clothing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.